'I'm sorry that food costs money': Inside the imagined thoughts of Loblaws

→ Оригинал (без защиты от корпорастов) | Изображения из статьи: [1] [2] [3] [4]

'If Canadians are unhappy with the way Loblaws is conducting itself, they are welcome to put the NDP in charge of Canadian food distribution'

Get the latest from Tristin Hopper straight to your inbox

Published May 04, 2024  •  Last updated May 04, 2024  •  5 minute read

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh in a Loblaws store to complain about the prices. Does he know that he and other Canadians are not obligated to shop there? Photo by Mickey Djuric/The Canadian Press/File

Loblaw Companies Ltd. - the parent company of grocery retailers such as Loblaws, Superstore, Provigo and T&T - has long been a singular target for criticism by the federal NDP, whose leader Jagmeet Singh has often blamed them for elevated rates of grocery inflation.

And this week, Loblaw's various subsidiaries became the target of a coordinated online boycott, which prompted chairman Galen Weston to call their complaints "misguided."

Advertisement 2

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Article content

Article content

In Dear Diary, the National Post satirically re-imagines a week in the life of a newsmaker. This week, Tristin Hopper takes a journey inside the thoughts of Loblaws.

Monday

Loblaw Companies Ltd. is proud to be Canada's leading grocery supplier, and we understand that as the public face of retail food, it is natural that we should face occasional public ire when that food does not meet expectations. However, I feel it necessary to clear up two common myths.

Myth One: Loblaws makes the food. Contrary to popular opinion, a large, climate-controlled building filled with perishable items for sale is not a natural phenomenon. What you're seeing is the end point of a rather large and complex system of food production and distribution, most of which is not owned or controlled by us. Take chicken, for example. This food is derived from an animal that is also called a chicken, and Loblaws plays no role in the process by which that animal becomes food. We merely obtain the animal in its food form and offer it for sale.

Myth Two: Loblaws gets the food for free. For someone who has ever plucked a ripe blackberry from a public park at zero cost, it can be difficult to grasp that this economic calculus actually applies to very few food items. We are not given the food by the government, and our suppliers — without exception — require monetary compensation.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

Advertisement 3

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Tuesday

There is another important point I would like to emphasize to Canadians: You are not under any legal obligation to purchase the food at a Loblaw affiliate. There is no legislation or contract compelling a relationship between yourself and Loblaw Companies Ltd. We are a private organization that exists to offer products for sale on a voluntary basis: If you do not consent to any of the circumstances surrounding that exchange, you can refuse to participate.

However, a corollary to this is that the inverse is also true. Even though we offer many items that are highly desirable and even necessitous for life, that imparts no obligation upon us to ensure that the items are made available to Canadians under circumstances that we would not find fiscally sustainable. People need food — this is correct — but this fact unfortunately has limited bearing on our aforementioned obligation to compensate the suppliers of this food.

Wednesday

When you enter a grocery store operated by a Loblaw affiliate (which, again, is voluntary) it is entirely your choice what items you choose to purchase (or not purchase). If the price of beef does not accord with your budget, we are proud to offer the option of not purchasing that beef.

Advertisement 4

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

It is true that we offer a number of items for sale that are expensive, some of which have become much more expensive in recent months. But I would note that we also have a wide selection of items whose prices have remained comparatively static, such as potatoes, bananas and flour. However, I must warn that many of these items will require rudimentary preparation before consumption. While a bag of flour has experienced a comparatively diminished rate of price inflation as compared to Doritos, the downside is that you will generally not be able to consume flour directly from the bag. At the very least, it must be mixed with water and exposed to heat, both of which may impose additional costs.

Thursday

If Loblaw Companies Ltd. was the sole provider of Canadian food, I can understand that this would reasonably open us up to a heightened level of responsibility as regards the population of Canadians. But we are happy to report that this is not the case. There exist literal thousands of stores, restaurants and other businesses offering food for sale. We have no control over these other entities, and they are free to operate under conditions that the consumer may find more attractive. And as we mentioned before, the consumer has no legal obligation to continue shopping at our stores; they can obtain their food from one of these other entities.

Advertisement 5

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

In fact, our control over food is so minimal that it is possible for Canadians to obtain nourishment without ever involving either us or one of the other entities I mentioned. Agriculture - the human cultivation of domesticated plants - can be performed at a scale small enough for an individual. Canada is also home to many examples of large fauna that - with appropriate licensing - can be legally killed and consumed.

Friday

Now, with all we've learned about the complex and exciting business of grocery retail, I would end by saying that if Canadians are unhappy with the way Loblaws is conducting itself, they are welcome to put the NDP in charge of Canadian food distribution.

While I would never claim any expertise in politics, I can say that the food business offers distinct differences from the business of running a federal political party.

For one, when a grocery store enters into contracts with other organizations, there are generally mutual and enforceable expectations upon both parties. What would not be advisable would be to enter into a contract in which we surrender large amounts of resources for no discernible gain, and then spend all our time publicly defaming the contracting party.

Second - and most importantly - to run a coordinated system of food distribution across five time zones, you actually need to do things and understand stuff. You can't just yell and expect things to happen.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Dear Diary: Inside the thoughts of a keffiyeh

  2. Dear Diary: Inside the thoughts of Tim Hortons pizza

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

Article content

Get the latest from Tristin Hopper straight to your inbox